China’s CBDC and its potential impact on the dollar


The convergence of developments in China’s digital currency space and the status of the U.S. dollar has garnered significant attention. Reports suggest that China’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) may be operational by year-end, alongside similar endeavors by other countries and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). This raises intriguing questions about the implications for the dollar’s global standing.



China has diligently worked on its CBDC for a decade, and recent reports hint at an imminent launch. However, the more pressing matter revolves around the collaborative efforts of multiple countries, including China, to establish international payment systems that function independently of the dollar. While the yuan is still far from achieving major global currency status, collaborative initiatives with the BIS, Thailand, UAE, and Hong Kong aim to create a platform for utilizing their respective CBDCs, reducing reliance on dollar-based payment systems.

The dollar dominates international commerce, facilitating about 90% of foreign exchange transactions. Yet, with emerging mechanisms that sidestep dollar dependency, the focus should shift to maintaining technological competitiveness to sustain dollar prevalence. Although still nascent, these mechanisms underscore the potential to modernize slow and costly international payment processes while reducing the leverage that dollar-based transactions afford the United States.


The complex landscape of CBDC adoption and international relations

The potential emergence of international payment systems detached from the dollar has ignited discussions about the future of global currency dynamics. However, challenges abound in the form of international adoption, concerns over data privacy, and the strategic interests of various nations. For instance, some nations might hesitate to adopt CBDCs if it means relinquishing transaction privacy to the central bank of another country, such as China. The broad adoption of such systems hinges on their practicality, efficiency, and alignment with individual nations’ interests.



This shift also raises a crucial point about cryptocurrency and its role in this evolving landscape. While it’s unlikely that established cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin will directly threaten the dollar, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to specific currencies—could play a more consequential role in the future. Despite that, the regulatory framework for stablecoins remains under development, necessitating robust oversight to mitigate risks while fostering innovation.


Regulatory landscape and implications for crypto ETFs


The regulatory environment for cryptocurrency in the United States is complex and multifaceted. The recent focus on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and the potential transition to international payment mechanisms accentuates the necessity of a robust regulatory framework. Currently, regulations for cryptocurrencies exist at the state level.



The future remains uncertain regarding the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approach to cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs). While Bitcoin Futures ETFs have gained approval, concerns persist over the regulatory oversight of the underlying cash market for cryptocurrencies. The SEC’s cautious approach underscores the necessity for a comprehensive regulatory structure that extends to both the futures and spot markets. The evolving legal landscape also highlights the need to determine whether cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities or commodities, necessitating the establishment of a framework that fosters innovation while safeguarding investor interests.



For more insights and analysis, visit

Share :

Latest News